Each sector of the economy and public life is affected by the COVID-19 epidemic. Transportation isn't an exception. Since states started issuing stay-at-home orders, ridership levels have plummeted as much as 95 percent, which has resulted in billions of dollars in lost revenue. Reductions in economic activity have resulted in a reduction of state and local taxes which are significant source of funding for many public transit agencies. How to reduce costs and reopen the business with a fair priceTransit agencies will have to figure out what cuts will have the greatest impact on passengers, and which lines should be reinstated when the economy reopens. Be aware that these decisions could have an uneven and possibly discriminatory impact, we've suggested four actions transit agencies could take to ensure an equitable response in both cutting and reopening transit lines. Visit this link for effective information public transport now. Trains and bus routes should be maintained and reopened depending on the amount of passengers not only on require. Typically, when budgets are reduced agencies determine which lines to eliminate based on ridership, starting with lines with the smallest number of riders. Even though ridership is important to keep agencies in business, it does not always align perfectly with need. People who depend on transit and have no alternative means of transportation might not be able to live along routes with the highest number of riders particularly in areas where the most dense areas are unaffordable to lower-income households. The agencies should decide which routes serve high-need groups with methods like the spatial mismatch of low-wage workers, as well as base cuts and reopenings on this issue. Transit-dependent and low-income riders must be involved Agents should talk to passengers who are left with no alternatives to learn about the services that can be eliminated with the least disruption. An agency might have to decide between cutting the frequency of a bus route or the addition of another. Customers may choose one option over the other. Agencies should invite feedback from transit-dependent riders on the kind of services they'd like and organize virtual meetings using translation and audio accommodations for riders to have a say in the decisions. Make sure paratransit service has not been impaired Paratransit agencies can't hinder fixed route services from operating, as per the Americans with Disabilities Act. They can, however, reduce paratransit service relative to fixed route service similar to it. Since the majority of transit agencies lease their paratransit services to private firms, the agencies have to insist on the private companies to offer on-demand services and also provide accessible vehicles to ensure that people with disabilities of any kind are able to benefit from them. Find new and innovative alternatives to buses and trains Buses and trains appear to be the primary source of transmission of the coronavirus, so transit agencies need to look at other options until the threat has diminished. Riders might be able to use services such as subsidized bicycle sharing, e-riding or electric scooters that can offer safer alternatives, especially in areas with limited buses. Collaboration with employers and other private companies can also be a way to provide more secure alternatives for riders so they don't have the difficult decision of missing work or contracting coronavirus. The COVID-19 pandemic is threatening public transportation and transit-dependent riders. The decisions made by transit officials must be taken in a fair and equitable manner to ensure our most vulnerable residents, workers, and passengers can travel in a safe manner.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |